Sociology and Social Governance

Sociology and Social Governance (1)

While it is widely accepted that human beings are social animals that seek out each other’s company and work in teams, the simultaneous contention that we are motivated primarily by self-interest has given rise to a long-running philosophical and political dispute between ‘individualistic’ and ‘collectivistic’ ideologies. This dispute has been given added potency by the advent of neo-Darwinism and its offshoots, sociobiology and selfish gene theory, which dispute the evolutionary sustainability of altruism and the organizational scale at which ‘natural selection’ operates as a discriminatory external force. At the root of these disputes is the abstract supposition – based ultimately on the definitive mutual exclusiveness of space and matter – that completely autonomous entities can exist as discrete individuals or groups at any scale of organization. Awareness of natural inclusion reveals that such autonomy is impossible, and therefore that opposition between individualistic and collectivistic ideologies is as unnecessary and costly as it is ubiquitous in modern political confrontation. Individualistic cultures are as incoherent as collectivistic cultures are suppressive; neither is sustainable. The needs of uniquely varied individuals are not incompatible with those of the diverse gatherings in which they participate co-creatively. They are complementary. What is needed is the kind of social governance that recognises the needs of each in the other’s dynamic influence and balances these according to circumstances. Sadly such a form of governance is not possible in polarized societies forced to choose between one or other inadequate alternative while excluding the middle ground where both are acknowledged and appreciated.

Self as a Natural Centre of Circulation

by

How do you perceive the life of your Self in relation to Nature? Have you ever walked down the same path twice? Is every day, every encounter you make along your way through life exactly the same to you? If not, do you notice what differs, what changes, what to expect, what not to expect and what it all means to you?

Read more...
Subscribe to this RSS feed

NSP GK5

What’s Wrong With ‘I’ and ‘We’?

The Four distinctive kinds of ‘I-abuse’ and ‘we-abuse’ that arise from imposing a false discontinuity between energy and space are identified and their damaging influence briefly described in this article. Natural Inclusional...

08-01-2018 Hits:467 Biological Science and Ecology

Read more

Self as a Natural Centre of Circulation

How do you perceive the life of your Self in relation to Nature? Have you ever walked down the same path twice? Is every day, every encounter you make along...

07-01-2018 Hits:313 Sociology and Social Governance

Read more

Introduction to Natural Inclusion

It's always fun imagining what might have brought you here to explore the Natural Inclusion website. Perhaps you've come across the term in a book or on the internet? Or...

07-01-2018 Hits:290 About Natural Inclusion

Read more

What Stops The Penny Dropping?

Why abstract-mindedness prevents the natural inclusional penny from dropping? A brief poetic reflection on what locks most people in to a damaging perception of reality that automatically prevents receptivity to what...

07-01-2018 Hits:281 Language and Linguistics

Read more